Why theme-based schools?

June 22, 2009

I'm working on a guide to creating theme-based schools and found a bit of branding wisdom, courtesy of Seth Godin,that's particularly applicable.


Theme-based schools use specific concepts and/or activities to facilitate best practices. Like corrective lenses, specialized thematic prescriptions help students and teachers focus. They provide a framework for understanding what the school stands for. In consumer terms, a theme is similar to a brand name.

Adopting a consumer perspective

Seth Godin, a thought leader in the field of marketing, offers a very simple formula for what makes a brand effective:

[What the consumer is led to expect] x [the importance or value they place on that expectation] = the power/effectiveness of the brand.

Godin makes several critical points that apply as well to what makes an effective theme as they do to what makes an effective brand:
o A brand that hasn't created specific expectations has no power to attract consumers, and
o A brand that fails to live up to the expectations it has developed quickly loses its power.
o When a brand delivers what it promises, it provides emotional relief. It satisfies a very human need to know you'll get what you expect and not be disappointed.

Godin calls this "emotional resonance" and recommends building "... the most predictable, emotional experience you can among those that care about you."

Too many schools have failed to live up to expectations. For schools in need of improvement, restructuring (which easily equates with re-branding) offers the opportunity for a fresh start. Adopting a theme in that process offers the school community a 'brand' name to identify with, along with a promise to live up to their expectations. This encourages loyalty over time, assuming the school community's expectations are met. (Sadly, time is the factor that most frequently undermines school improvement initiatives.) A theme also makes it easier to engage other participants, including district administrators, boards of education, and last but not least, potential sponsors.

It is also important to note that themes, like brands, cannot necessarily remain static. They need to be responsive to external changes such as, for schools, the growing ubiquity of technology. Similarly, themes and thematic units will very likely change as they're used, assessed and improved. In fact, from a curriculum standpoint, theme schools often start with one or two themed units per grade level, developed by the staff prior to the changeover. It can actually take a few years to roll out the full program. What is critical is that the theme be clearly identified from the outset and that the 'brand culture' be established through special customs and unique theme-based learning experiences as well as through decoration, signage, promotional literature, etc.


0 comments

Content vs. Skills vs. 'The System'

May 28, 2009

The deeper I get into this project of writing a guide for creating theme-based schools, the more I realize how stuck we are in a system that just doesn't work anymore. The popular debate right now is about the relative value of teaching traditional content versus teaching 21st century skills. My thoughts on that are summed up in the last sentence of the first paragraph.

(I wrote this back in March, but my site was down. Fortunately, things don't change that quickly in education :/ Anyway, I'm still working on the same damned guide, and given the pace of educational change, it should be quite evident that nothing else mentioned here has changed other than the time frame of articles described as 'recent'. )

2 comments

Critical Thinking vs. Fact-based Learning

May 7, 2009

Is there really any question of which is more important? Traditional curriculum emphasizes factual knowledge. Games promote critical thinking. So we need to find a way to make games work in the classroom??? Am I crazy to think that the statement "... schools do have to change in some fairly fundamental ways" is a bit of an understatement?

0 comments

Always Learning

February 6, 2008

I'm finding Obama's habit of referring to Clinton's campaign as a bridge back to the 20th Century extremely grating and more than a little ageist. I think there are plenty of boomers -- including Ms. Clinton -- who are more than capable of understanding the future and the need to change. This is only tangentially related to my post, but that's also relevant ... and it feels damn good to get it off my chest!

4 comments

Brain Power

October 3, 2007

Can we actually conceive something smarter than ourselves?

9 comments

Creative Problem-Solving 101

September 26, 2007

Kids are a lot smarter than we give them credit for.

0 comments